But he definitely had the hacker ethos.
So yeah, he died. That's sad for him and his people. And I'm sure he had some decent qualities as most people do. However, I won't remember him as a particularly honest or ethical man.
No. The euphemism then isn’t “hacker” but “disruptor”.
Move fast and break things.
Moving fast and breaking things itself isn't something to be praised.
If you have to lie to promote a course of action you believe will lead to better outcomes, maybe it's you who is wrong. Maybe that course of action won't lead to the outcomes you think.
And if I have to replicate all of the work you did just to find out which of your results were related to what you were pushing, why should I take anything you say at face value?
Besides the lying though it would have been better to stick to the one thing that he was investigating: fast food. He already had some ridiculous extra requirements like always finishing his meals and a high calorie count (the former sounds like some ingrained motherly “finish your meal!” scorning latent in the psychology of some adults, not a fast food thing per se). But he also stopped exercising and restricted his steps per day. It is much more interesting to change only one variable in your life when that variable is the thing that you are supposed to be critiquing.
Or else change the investigation to “Average American Me”.
The right diet is absolutely an effective way to increase productivity in life changing ways.
Huge stretch