How does the prevalence of traumatized individuals characterize a society as a whole? For example, it seems that a society where the majority are traumatized should be fundamentally different from a society where a minority are traumatized.
How does the prevalence of traumatized individuals characterize a society as a whole? For example, it seems that a society where the majority are traumatized should be fundamentally different from a society where a minority are traumatized.
So I guess that's one thing that might characterize society: Lots of frustrated would-be grandparents.
Perhaps also many alienated grandparents, confused, hurt, and angry that their children don't want them involved in their grandchildren's lives.
https://www.webmd.com/parenting/news/20230620/dealing-with-a...
I had four friends, separately, individually, reach out to me and say, "I know this isn't actually my business, and I wonder whether I should even say anything, but why does your dad think it's OK to talk to you like he does?"
I then spent three more years telling him each time he belittled me or spoke to me like a child that he could either speak to me with the common decency every single person deserves just by virtue of being human, or I would prevent him from speaking to me altogether.
It was never fine, but growing up in his house, I never knew any different was possible. I thought that was just how I deserved to be treated.
It took other people to tell me it wasn't OK, and had never been OK, but I guarantee if you ask him, he will tell you he has no idea what happened, and will certainly blame anyone but himself.
If it does happen anyway, you're probably also less likely to be self-soothing with listicles about how it's definitely the fault of your ungrateful kids and whoever turned them against you.
I hope you're in a better spot now, and I'm glad you found the strength to demand better.
I'd be pleasantly surprised to find out sincere apologies ever happened.
In my family of origin apologies usually started by owning something the apologizer did, but invariably moved on to a "but" that made the recipient the butt of the apology.