At least in past court cases I’m familiar, you can’t use an impersonator and get people to think it’s the real thing.
It’s not like Tom Waits ever wanted to hock chips
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-09-me-238-st...
It’s not like Tom Waits ever wanted to hock chips
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-09-me-238-st...
Imo Sky's voice is distinct enough from Scarlett, and it wasn't implied to _be_ her.
Sam's "Her" tweet could be interpreted as such, but defending the tweet as the concept of "Her", rather than the voice itself, is.
but did openAI make any claims about whose voice this is? Just because a voice sounds similar or familiar, doesn't mean it's fraudulent.
> - Not receiving a response, OpenAI demos the product anyway, with Sam tweeting “her” in reference to Scarlett’s film.