https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/sus...
Carbon credit schemes may do SOMETHING to offset climate change but less than they advertise.
That being said, maybe Microsoft won't, and will buy the low quality "we totally were going to cut this forest but now we won't pinky promise" kind of credits, but I'd at least give them the benefit of the doubt over the average greenwashing corporation.
Note that I recognize many (possibly most?) carbon credits programs are bogus or worse, but trying to draw attention to circumstances where it's not always so cut and dry.
Even some of these, hilariously enough, despite how insanely quantifiable their benefits are, you see phenomenon like phantom credits like where Alberta, Canada gave Shell double credit for each tonne of Co2 they actually reduced.
I'm sure subsidies for green energy projects do reduce emissions, I just think the accounting is BS.