It seems like it should hallucinate less, as it directly quates, but nope, it still halucinates just as much and then gives a quote that directly contradicts its statement.
Accuracy and supportedness of the claims made in Elicit are two of the most central things we focus on—it's a shame it didn't work as well as we'd like in this case.
I'd appreciate knowing more about the specifics so we can understand and improve
Actual quote from the abstract: “ No tryptamines were detected in the basidiospores, and only psilocin was present at 0.47 wt.% in the mycelium.”
It does not differentiate between psilocin and psilocybin, those are two different molecules.