Anyone looking for work can probably empathize. All the other websites mentioned are distant runners up to that monstrosity.
Anyone looking for work can probably empathize. All the other websites mentioned are distant runners up to that monstrosity.
I was railing against workday for a different reason last week. I had a qualifying event and needed to add a dependent to my health insurance. The first screen in the flow was to change my coverage, but it only offered "self" plans (not the self + dependent I was trying to change to). I finally learned (after 2 screenshot laden emails with HR) that I had to "submit my choice and continue" for the wrong plan before I'd be allowed to choose the correct self + dependent plan on some future screen that I had no idea even existed. The "submit my choice and continue" felt rather final.
That was also the thesis from an article that made it to HN’s front page a week ago [2].
[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/everyone-hates-workday-human...
If it's anything like the "employment sector" options that banks ask you to pick from, then they're not trying to collect accurate info, but rather asking you to bucket yourself into a categorization system used by some very popular credit/risk-scoring heuristics.
My guess for why an HR platform is asking such a thing: it probably populates a field that can be fetched through an API, by corporate spending platforms (Float et al) that integrate with Workday, to determine (or at least "recommend") the employees who should be issued spend cards.
For that matter, Peoplesoft isn't any better.