That should mean you know better than to accuse one of your colleagues of ethics violations on the basis of a cursory perusal of Wikipedia.
Would you do something like that using your real name?
Would you do something like that using your real name?
> "it wasn't on Wikipedia" is hardly an excuse when it comes to ethics
which is what I actually wrote, in a post where I'm not even talking about the particular situation. I expressed dismay about a failure to properly attribute ideas, and then I explained that I don't care about what was written in 2014 on Wikipedia, experts should know better anyway. If you've decided to read an accusation in what I wrote, that is absolutely on you. The most negative thing I wrote about the author was:
> You'd expect an emeritus professor to have enough time on their hands to check their sources...
And, again, I would have absolutely no problem saying that in public with my real name. I've said much "worse".