First it needs an incentive to lie. Or it’s prompted to, or the model architecture allows it
Given that one the largest problems with current LLMs is they will often "hallucinate" (i.e. lie or provide deceptive answers), it seems strange to phrase it this way.
>Deceptive Misaligned Mesa-Optimisers? It's More Likely Than You Think...
Or, "It sounds near impossible to design an architecture that doesn't allow it"
No one ever accuses the Google index of lying when they get a misleading result.
Lets take a simple non computing model first: You're in a car, you hit the brakes pedal, you expect the brakes to be applied and the car to slow down. If it does not, then the brakes are broken.
More complex computing model: Your modern car interprets there is an object in front of it and applies the brakes. If there was, yay, your car may have saved you. If there was not, you may have just caused a 20 car pile up on interstate. So much for that 'FILE' just being a file.
Please wake up and realize that you live in a world where 'FILES' have agency depending on their connectedness.
I dare not get into a discussion about the word "lie" here. I have a weekend I want to enjoy.