https://www.memri.org/search-results?country_id_report%5B0%5...
https://www.memri.org/search-results?country_id_report%5B0%5...
There's nothing more shocking than the stuff Ben Gvir (security minister of Israel) does or says.
The second interview even references his calls to burn women and children as, yknow, a bad thing.
"memri" doesnt seem to consider that valid context, that is probably because it is a state propaganda outfit acting on behalf of that same Israeli minister who openly expressed a desire to burn women and children.
This describes most interviews I've seen with Israeli government officials in the American press, although it's starting to change over the last few months.
So you seem to be trying to hold Al Jazeera to a vastly higher standard than mainstream US media, at least in this particular regard.
Simply reporting without comment on what important/influential individuals and groups are saying, and adding basic objective context, is a large part of mainstream journalism.
Pushback is often limited to the opinion pages.
The mainstream US news media would fall foul of broadcasting standards laws in a lot of liberal Western democracies. Here in the UK, due impartiality is a legal duty of news broadcasters. The First Amendment is not the norm globally and the US is exceptionally laissez-faire when it comes to the regulation of broadcast news.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-co...
The most-read newspaper in Israel, Israel Hayom, is owned by a friend of Bibi. Is it impartial? Should it be shut down?