BBC is known to have issues with factuality.
https://deadline.com/2023/10/bbc-wrong-to-speculate-on-gaza-...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/07/21/bbc-reporter-nig...
But to address your point:
https://www.aljazeera.net/news/2024/5/3/%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B3%D...
"Russia is ready to discuss serious peace proposals, and Zelensky is rushing British weapons "
There is a spectrum of factuality, BBC News has problems with the govt threatening to shut it down if it doesn’t report what the govt wants it to report, but it’s no Russia Today, Daily Mail, or Fox News.
I am failing to see how an article about Russia's war correlates to OP's claim about Al Jazeera showing Hamas videos calling for an uprising. Can we get a direct link to the article that the OP mentioned?
> "Russia is ready to discuss serious peace proposals, and Zelensky is rushing British weapons "
Is that not correct? Or what's the problem with it? A basic translate + fact check seems it's basically correct?
"Russia is ready to discuss serious peace proposals, and Zelensky is rushing British weapons
"
Just a minute of searching directly.
https://www.memri.org/search-results?country_id_report%5B0%5...
There's nothing more shocking than the stuff Ben Gvir (security minister of Israel) does or says.
The second interview even references his calls to burn women and children as, yknow, a bad thing.
"memri" doesnt seem to consider that valid context, that is probably because it is a state propaganda outfit acting on behalf of that same Israeli minister who openly expressed a desire to burn women and children.
So you seem to be trying to hold Al Jazeera to a vastly higher standard than mainstream US media, at least in this particular regard.
Simply reporting without comment on what important/influential individuals and groups are saying, and adding basic objective context, is a large part of mainstream journalism.
Pushback is often limited to the opinion pages.
The mainstream US news media would fall foul of broadcasting standards laws in a lot of liberal Western democracies. Here in the UK, due impartiality is a legal duty of news broadcasters. The First Amendment is not the norm globally and the US is exceptionally laissez-faire when it comes to the regulation of broadcast news.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/broadcast-co...
This describes most interviews I've seen with Israeli government officials in the American press, although it's starting to change over the last few months.
The most-read newspaper in Israel, Israel Hayom, is owned by a friend of Bibi. Is it impartial? Should it be shut down?
https://www-aljazeera-net.translate.goog/where/arab/palestin...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Jazeera_controversies_and_c...