In the current climate, being paranoid is the sensible option.
In the current climate, being paranoid is the sensible option.
A handful of US troops is not a significant deployment, and I think there's many ways that US and Chinese militaries actually collaborate and communicate, and one of these is (most likely) through the plausibly deniable route of Taiwan.
Forward deployment like this are not there to threaten China. They are there, to tie down USA politicians.
Suppose China makes a move on Taiwan, now they have to play around US troops or fear bringing USA into the war. US politicians now have troops stuck in a war zone, they can no longer just was their hands of the situation - that would be politically unacceptable.
Imagine if Russia had even symbolical amount of troops stationed in Gaza, Israel would be in a difficult position, indiscriminate fire can kill them and start an incident
Although your point is interesting and I hadn't considered it about the insurance policy aspect of the deployment.
What's your background? :) haha :)
What? Where? Can you give some examples?
> is about to give Taiwan billions of dollars for "defence"
Why quote defence? You think they give it for offence?
I suppose you're a citizen of the West; then US hegemony is certainly in your best interest.
I am guessing you are from US, and you guys do not notice that quite often, domestic US politics shifts and you have a schism and throw one of your ‘allies’ under the bus.
Mr. Macron he just made a speech about how Europe can no longer rely on US.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-04-25/macron-sa...