Have you seen anything newer that resoundingly disputes this and the studies cited herein?
More recent, and accounting for more recent studies: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209379112...
Secondly, this only establishes a correlation (and a relatively weak one at that). But there are lots of other plausible links between choosing to work in a low income asbestos industry and ovarian cancer.
I'm not saying J&J did nothing wrong, but if you read the documents their testing scheme actually far exceeded the federal requirements and they regularly changed suppliers if they felt there was a risk of asbestos. Them throwing out outlier test data is only suspicious with the post-hoc assumption they were guilty of hiding something.
Certain other medical products imposed on the population raise similar concerns…