Hacker News Reader

> Until Arti is more mature, we recommend it for experimental use only.

Helps to read the entire context. This means that it likely hasn't had a security audit yet, and may de-anonymize you due to a bug. It doesn't mean it's abandonware.

the link posted by tromp is to the readme from 3 years ago. you should read the latest readme before making assumptions about the quality of arti today

Where does it say that in the README?

They might have been referencing the link posted by tromp (currently top comment)

I don't think holding the current state of the project to a version of the README from three years ago is even remotely anywhere near a good faith comparison.

If it’s a mistake, then it’s in good faith, right? Maybe the README no longer literally says “learning Rust as I go along”, but it definitely did in the one I looked at quickly (yes, from tromp’s comment)

That said... is it really “really real” if it’s still experimental 3 years later?