> everything is compute.
Isnt this the problem OP is referring to? If everything is compute then no useful distinction can be made.
Isnt this the problem OP is referring to? If everything is compute then no useful distinction can be made.
If you what you want is a powerful analysis framework, that's gold. If you know how to abstract your way forward with that framework that too.
So arguing that the distinction is useless because it's universal, is like saying logic is useless because it's universal.