Hacker News Reader

Comment by everyone | Hacker News Reader

Vote with your wallet. Never buy a car that has any of that crap in it.

Serious question: how does one find out if a given car (make/model) has that stuff in it?

I'm kinda-sorta thinking about replacing my 2006 car, maybe. The last time I bought a car I definitely didn't have to worry about it spying on me :)

It's a bad faith argument. I'm not as familiar with the other markets, but this would mean avoiding all Japanese cars. Which is a bad idea if you also want a reliable car and/or value.

I'm just familiar with the data collection and the flow of data to insurance companies for JDM cars. A quick look at an EFF article and you should probably also avoid every car manufacturer.

Please elaborate on issues with Japanese cars.

They sell all your driving data.

Mine doesn't go to LexisNexis like the GM data does, at least. I checked.

Luckily for my I’m not sure Jeep does it. Pretty sure my wife’s BMW sends everything short of audio/video recordings back to home.

As the other guy said, the data is sold.

Toyota Motor Insurance Services, Inc. (TMIS) collects the data from Subaru, Mazda, and Toyota. I don't believe Honda does, looks like they go through a different data broker. TMIS also gives the data to other companies that create metrics and ML models for insurance companies.

And what happens when every car manufacturer has this, and you need a new car? Walk? Start your own car factory? Nah. Consumer protection laws are the right way. It’s not actually a free market, despite what they might say.

It's hard for me to imagine needing a new car. There will be suitable older used cars available for a long time still. When there isn't anymore, I'll work out a different plan.

I agree with you that the law is the right way to address these issues, but until then I'm on my own.

America will end up looking like Cuba.

On the other hand the 3G system shutdown might help this issue.

By the time todays new cars become used, hopefully people will have figured out how to disable these features.

They already are. For lots of cars, a quick web search will get you instruction for how to disable the car's ability to phone home. As time goes on, I expect more and more cars will have such instructions.

That's pretty much my backup plan for when the day comes that even used cars include this stuff. But until then, it's easier for me to stick with used cars that don't require modification.

This is my problem. We have 2 cars, a 2006 and a 2007. The time will come when we have to replace them. Right now I'm just hoping that industries like crate engines take off before that happens, because I don't personally believe consumer protection laws will work.

How long do you think it will be until they figure out how to get the same info from your phone? If they aren't already.

How will they know which car you're in for any given journey?

bluetooth, wifi, AA/carplay, start stop destinations, starting with people who only have 1 registered car

I don't understand how those will make a difference if a friend gives you a lift somewhere and back again? Or if your partner is driving?

You don't think there is tracking text or geo information that can identify you've had a convo with your friend and are going for a ride? That they can't identify acceleration habits between two people? It doesn't have to be perfect, its not like they're going to tell you how it works.

That's exactly what I'm doing.

But doesn't that crap lower the cost of ownership? I wouldn't buy it -- but isn't that the argument?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com