I say that a very disgruntled Russian who hasn't had a sane, predictable life since 2020.
I say that a very disgruntled Russian who hasn't had a sane, predictable life since 2020.
Seems that it is has made it politically more difficult, if not economically so.
I’m asking because how on earth can you claim that? I’m close to the ecosystem involved and the sanctions work incredibly well. They’re not sufficient and there are bypasses but that doesn’t mean they don’t work.
Sanctions work by reducing growth and the economy of its target—usually a pariah state—over time by reducing growth year over year, which compounds (negatively) over time to make the target less and less influential.
> I say that a very disgruntled Russian who hasn't had a sane, predictable life since 2020.
And the alternative to economic sanctions would be… ?
There is a _bit_ of hope you'll do something about it.
The oligarchs could arrange to put something extra in the breakfast one day. Or there could be a chance meeting with a window.
You're a feeble Internet nerd whose position is an aberration of history.
I'm sure you'll selectively apply your morals rather than having enough intelligence to understand what you're advocating.
This is pretty reprehensible and you should be embarrassed.
The one single issue is what happens to the nukes.
It's a shame you can't hear how pathetic you sound in your idealogical prison / echo chamber.
The price of energy would become unaffordable for all of Europe and spike across the globe. The additional pressure would create additional conflict and suffering for everyone.
I'm struggling to find any reason other than blind hatred for your genuinely stupid and brain dead position.
Nobody is scared of this Kremlin talking point either, the market would stabilize fine.
I'm happy to pay more in order to not fund the Russian terrorist mafia state.
Like, uhhh, wanting to stay alive and not go to jail? Is that a good enough reason?