This is food for their argumentation, and with that kind of stuff, it's hard to explain that science should prevail.
This is sad.
This is food for their argumentation, and with that kind of stuff, it's hard to explain that science should prevail.
This is sad.
It seems perfectly pro-science to me. It is just an abuse of science. The anti science take would be to deny parents pass on genes and as such eugenics / forced sterilization wouldn't stop bad genes.
> > Our governments have done awful things in the name of science, including eugenics and forcible sterilizations.
"...in the name of science" -- it hardly matters whether it's proper science or anti-/un-scientific nonsense when the result is deeply immoral. The fact is that both science and "science" have been and continue to be used to justify horrible acts. We have to stop that.
How can you simultaneously know that pharmaceutical corporations are corrupt and choose profits over health, but also think it is crazy to question the vaccines they produce. Those are two contradictory ideas, but the vast majority of people would agree that both are true. It seems like we have been manipulated.
Do you know of Maddie de Garay's story?
It is right to hold people accountable