My point isn't that you should agree with Elon's tweets, but just to ask if you know why it is that you are familiar with his thoughts but not the thoughts of CEOs of companies that you give money too.
That inconsistent buying choice behavior is interesting and I brought it up. Sorry if that makes you upset.
Sir, you just have to read Elon's Musks twitter account on his "X" platform which he owns. You don't need third parties to tell you what is wrong with him.
Twitter wasn't as big back then as it is now. Earlier all his thoughts were kept mostly to himself and social media wasn't as big. Twitter amplifies his inner thoughts. People don't seem to like it.
Bro, you can see the tweets yourself. Nobody is putting words into this guy's mouth. When people show you who they are, believe them.
Do you think there is any chance that the legacy
media has convinced you to behave this way?
If you want to suggest there's a conspiracy involving the mainstream media's coverage of Musk, you'd need to point out some comparable CEOs who behaved similarly and were ignored or covered differently.I don't think you can, because Musk is so singular. He runs multiple cutting-edge companies and has behaved very publicly in some very outlandish ways. Publicly calling people pedos, praising the alt-right, publicly smoking weed, a compelling list of actual achievements combined with an equally large list of conspicuous vaporware promises. There's nobody quite like him. Thus the coverage.
What happened to liberals caring about climate change?
I do not think "caring about climate change" entails ignoring some fairly spectacular public behavior from a guy making electric cars.Did the NYT not do the most basic research on Elon, which would have shown his consistent history of this kind of behavior they are now criticizing him for.
Ok but that's worse. You do get how that's worse, right?