95% of zips in 1963 were safe and livable. Now everyone is competing to live in 15% of zipcodes
You address the supply side of the "housing crisis", what about demand?
You address the supply side of the "housing crisis", what about demand?
I've been trying to give your comments the benefit of the doubt, but now it's abundantly clear that you're fundamentally unserious about having a conversation grounded in reality.
Why the scare quotes especially when no such term was used?
>what about demand?
"...growing demand due to job growth" <- demand side was indeed mentioned.
It's literally illegal to build enough housing in many, many places where jobs are via low height limits, absurd parking requirements, and large setbacks etc.
95% of white suburban zips might have been safe and livable, but nowhere close to 95% of all zips.