I specifically pick out the EV as an example because by definition my system would never need to connect to the house or the grid, so I guess all I have is a disconnected battery (powerwall) to insure.
I specifically pick out the EV as an example because by definition my system would never need to connect to the house or the grid, so I guess all I have is a disconnected battery (powerwall) to insure.
If you go super cheap (the "$1000" system in the article), you'll be able to put a couple miles into the car in the afternoon on "level 1" charging. It's not nothing but it's not really practical for a car (but probably fine for an electric bike/moped). Also, most of the available power is unused since the battery is so small.
So you get a battery big enough to hold everything your panels can generate. You get a more powerful 240V inverter, a nice 8-10 kWh battery, and move to Southern California. With the best possible circumstances in July, you can fill up that battery every day, and add 19 miles to your car overnight.
Now you're at $10,000 for about 6,500 miles per year.
If the battery lasts 8 years (LFP can do 3000 cycles, 1 cycle per day = 8.2 years), you're paying 19¢/mile (and only if you use all of the power you generate).
Compare that to just plugging into the wall, which is 3-6¢/mile.
I agree with your conclusion that wall is better though.
Why would they want to incentivize more grid attached small solar at this point?
It would cost ~$6K. I estimate I’d save about $1500/yr from my electric bill. ROI isn’t great but most home projects have an even worse ROI so I still might do it just for kicks. Would also be nice to have a big Eco Flow battery I could use for other stuff.
I should write an article about it because I had planned to build something myself and keep all equipment outside and build a small wooden enclosure away from the house for it.