Netherlands had this problem in the 60s and the solution came in the form of a squatting movement.
I feel in the US people are ok with corporations committing crimes but not humans. Weird seeing as the humans are the ones without a home and the corporations are just trying to get rich.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squatting_in_the_Netherlands
That already happens in the states. Sometimes, you just need to go on vacation for a couple of weeks and come back to find your home squatted with a fake lease drawn up in crayon to throw you into a civil legal process. You can find tutorials online.
Empty units stopped being a thing.
It isn't a solution to anyone's problems except maybe as a way to live free while doing lots of drugs.
Squatting is legal.
In the USA property rights are very strong. Read the article I posted earlier. Basically in Amsterdam a lot of companies were colluding to keep apartments empty which inflated the price. In response people were legally allowed to squat the apartments provided they were unoccupied.
This fixes the problem of empty apartments.
Comparing the rights of squatters in the USA to the rights of squatters in other countries is a non-starter. I'm saying if citizens in the USA had the same rights to squat as they had in the Netherlands in the 70's and 80's the problem would be fixed.
Whether or not this would be to the public benefit in terms of automation, this is exactly what's happening here but with pricing. The law forbids price fixing, but courts are tech-dumb and so long as you pass your price fixing through an algorithm you've got decent shruggability on any claims made.
This would also make sense given that this algorithmic pricing platform is used by so many clients. If just enough real estate firms can maximize their profits in this way, they can afford to buy out anyone who might compete on price.
What experience do you have that you would be able to make a lofty claim like this?
Are the people working at DR Horton and Lennar and the like missing something obvious? I figure businesses that construct and sell tens of thousands of homes in a year are at the bleeding edge of figuring out how to most efficiently construct a house.
What's you're special experience that makes you so confident this is not the case? Seems like a pretty extraordinary claim.
The comment I responded to was edited to include the component about regulations being the problem. Obviously, the parameters within which to construct a house includes regulations, so my experience that automating home construction is not cost efficient yet is the fact that the largest and most successful home builders do not use those techniques. Aka reality.
Whether or not regulations are appropriate or not is a separate discussion, but in my experience, most are good other than the ones that forbid the type of housing being built (such as higher density), or excessive setbacks that waste land.
Edit: never mind, the comment I replied to was not edited, I just didn’t read it thoroughly. My bad!
I think we are pretty on the same page regarding regulations. Safety is important. But forbidding density via setbacks, parking minimums, and certain types of housing is what bites us. And there are some regulations enacted in the name of.safety, which create nonstandard requirements where a prefab home factory must either special case that one state/locality, or forbid selling there.
As an example, any factory-manufactured home sold in California must have a sprinkler system. Sprinkler systems are expensive, and while they're very valuable in large shared buildings, I question whether they are necessary to mandate in single family homes.
Of course this isn't targeted at manufactured homes; California mandates this in every new house.
But this fragments the manufacturing of homes and causes issues with getting the efficiencies you would expect from a factory. Multiple SKUs need to be built.
There's an old housing development nearby, perhaps constructed in the 1940s. There were two basic plans, along with mirror images of the plans. You have to look closely to see this, because over the decades the houses have been extensively remodeled and improved with things like garages, extensions, etc.
I strongly disagree with this. I watch several general contractors on Youtube. They come across as smart, educated individuals. They frequently talk about the things they do to save time or optimize. Yet, it's obvious that huge portions of their job still involve on the fly decision making.
You might be able to automate this, but it'd come with incredible upfront costs to de-risk and plan every detail. Factory based manufacturing largely doesn't have to deal with this since the environment is so highly controlled. Further, automated manufacturing puts significant time ahead of production building draft parts.