I tell them they spend too much time watching videos and playing games and should "branch out" into new hobbies. Do they do this? No.
That is to say, I don't think hypocrisy has anything to do with it.
I tell them they spend too much time watching videos and playing games and should "branch out" into new hobbies. Do they do this? No.
That is to say, I don't think hypocrisy has anything to do with it.
If they see you watching a YouTube video about circuitry or whatever, are they registering "that's an educational video about circuits" or are they just seeing the YouTube logo and thinking "Wow, $parent watches a lot of YouTube"?
Any kid is just going to register that you spend 10 (or whatever) hours a day on the computer, they aren't going to be categorizing your use into educational or not.
One unintended consequence I noticed already with time-limiting YT, is the kid is carefully planning her YT viewing usage and ends up not branching out to crafting/educational/etc. videos because she doesn't want to run out of time for the fun stuff. So this ends up unintentionally killing the desired content.
My gut feeling is that setting an example by doing (so like what you described) and occasionally recruiting the kid for assisting (but not forcing them to participate too much) is the right way forward. We'll see I guess...
In case it isn't, you're spending all your time on screens and not being present with your kids.
You're parenting by example that screen time is more important than family time.
Why would they listen to you when, to them, it probably seems like you're telling them to do what you won't?