Does Kyoo take a similar approach, or is it more user friendly? Plex's monetization efforts are silly, but Jellyfin seems very much not ready for prime time.
Does Kyoo take a similar approach, or is it more user friendly? Plex's monetization efforts are silly, but Jellyfin seems very much not ready for prime time.
There are still some edge cases, especially with extra which are not handled very well right now. It works even for weird anime naming, things like "[SomeGroup] Jojo's bizzare adventure - golden wings 12.mkv"
Videos
├── Anime
│ ├── [EMBER] Frieren S01E14 [BDRip] [1080p Dual Audio HEVC 10 bits] (1).1080.mp4
│ ├── Apothecary Diaries
│ │ └── S01E01.mkv
│ └── KAGUYA-SAMA LOVE IS WAR Season 4 Episode 1.1080.mp4
└── Cartoon
├── Royal Crackers
│ ├── Episode 1.mp4
│ └── Episode 2.mkv
└── Sanjay and Craig
├── 1x01 The one with the lion.avi
└── 1x02 Tufflips and Co.mp4
Does it build hierarchical collections in the same way?This is why I went back to iTunes. Full, robust metadata support and organization.
It's 2024. Why are people still cramming metadata into file names like it's 1983?
I would like to see a slim Jellyfin that does not have any media management code at all, tbh. Just media streaming.
On the plus side, lack of auto organize made me properly setup the complete arr stack, which throws things into correctly named directories, does support batch renaming for existing stuff, and handles a lot of other stuff on top of that.
It’s also brought privacy concerns, because there’s incentive for Plex to harvest and sell data from users paid and unpaid alike.
I’m currently subscribed, but all of this has me on the lookout for viable replacements.
I've been using Plex forEVER and the only time this kinda thing happened to me was when the scratch space Plex was using for transcodes and things got full
Also, everything in my library can be direct-played by the clients I use (primarily Apple TV 4k) too, so transcoding pretty much only happens when I’m loading up my iPad for a trip (once or twice a year tops).
The only monetized features that have decent overlap with user desires are the player features, mobile apps, plexamp and its sonic analysis stuff.
More importantly, that monetization strategy is a great fit for legal self-custody. I have a pretty large library of content I bought on DVD and ripped for personal use. I don't share it our as torrents and watch videos locally on my own network, there's nothing wrong with that and I like that Plex is still paid for the software that makes it work well for my use case.
I get the frustration - Plex didn't do it in the past, but if you look at it from 1000 ft, and are ignoring history, Plex isn't doing anything crazy here. If you install the app on your phone/Roku/whatever, it's on you to understand how to use it/customize it.
It isn’t about the users being Plex users “even though I and they don’t want to think they are” (an incredibly presumptuous way to phrase that, honestly) it’s about a fundamental change in behavior and execution in their product.
Nobody said they weren’t within their right to do what they’re doing, but people should be allowed to point out when this happens. They are fundamentally changing the way their app works. That is an user-hostile action regardless of how you slice it. And that might be fine from their point of view, but it clearly is an issue for existing user, as this entire thread of comments shows.
Any paid software you can run on your own hardware by definition is paying to use "your own" resources(CPU, GPU, storage, etc), what you're paying for is their effort in creating and maintaining the software. If they want a gatekeep features for a premium version that's their right, if you have a problem with it find something else or make it yourself.
What kind of video is non-playable without GPU transcoding?
Get two copies if you want LoFi alternatives. Transcoded HDR 4k etc looks way worse than just having a 1080p copy
And what I'm describing is definitely a pro scenario, so charging makes a lot of sense
I don't see the expectation of a standard naming format as unreasonable, given that it's open source and they're fairly short on developers
I'd probably use Jellyfin if it got the basics right and lacked a thing or two, or if its opinionated implementation was limited to trivialities like how Plex refuses to use local images not named cover.jpg. But it's too opinionated, too inflexibly, about too many things, and I think its opinions are stupid, so it crosses the line as far as I'm concerned. Doesn't help that the code is convoluted and I couldn't figure out how to make changes to the way it analyzes files easily.
It still did a great job and Picard nicely filled in the blanks.
I wish they would add a feature to clone the metadata database (including pictures of movie covers and actors). My fear is that imdb will disallow scraping especially for people like "my friend" who has thousands of movies.