There is a variety of computational photography tricks to enhance the quality of sensor data. However none of it is generating data wholesale but is rather just doing combination of sensor pixels to create the image.
To the best of my knowledge, Apple has no generative post processing so wouldn’t fall afoul of this.
Samsung on the other hand do generate content that isn’t in the shot, for example if it thinks there’s a moon it’ll insert a virtual one.
Google also have various post processing technologies like picking the best of faces from multiple photos. However it does mark them as edited.
I don’t know of any smartphone doing generative upscaling. It’s still quite a costly process that doesn’t scale well to mobile SoCs yet within a user acceptable timeframe .
If you send the image to someone or open it another app, they’re removed when I try it.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29750660
He admits he made a mistake and posts a little video showing what happened.
There’s an actual leaf in front of the head but the camera flattening makes them blend together.
If they shot this as a video or a “Live Photo” it would be much more apparent what they’re looking at.
Where is the line drawn between "AI" and codec compression?
* Both are algorithms.
* Both are fed source material.
* Both can be trained to produce a better output.
* Both are prompted.
* Both are highly parallel workloads.
* Both can be accelerated using accelerators.
* Both can produce new things ("hallucinate") and reproduce the source.
The rest of your points are too vague such that they could basically be applied to any number of computer algorithms.
Hallucination is the key element at play.
That is, in fact, a point I am making: "AI" as it stands today is a meaningless marketing term.
https://www.theverge.com/2013/8/6/4594482/xerox-copiers-rand...
- classical MTs: just jarring, "every work and without slack produce blunt child lift"
- pre-LLM AI MT: most natural, but drops expressions that it's not sure about: "We choose to visit in this decennial and it's not easy."
- LLM: too US English centric, dry, and weighing flows over content too much: "Is it one obsolete-aesthetic word? So scary to say that."
All these are useful, just none are panacea to translation problem(including humans).[0]: https://twitter.com/mitchcohen/status/1476351601862483968