> (2) code that wants/needs the new functionality updates the usage at its leisure.
That's how you end up with infinite support costs in a large org. I think the point is that these changes are done atomically.
That's how you end up with infinite support costs in a large org. I think the point is that these changes are done atomically.
The alternative is you do the work for them - which you may or may not have the expertise for, and the other team may not even have time for the needed code review.