and the rest of what you state is still very much up for medical, scientific, and philosophical debate.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/adhd-brain-vs-norm...
sentience is 'caused' by the 'structure of the brain.' and?
That's fine; I'm not trying to change your mind because you've clearly already decided you know enough facts and aren't going to listen to any new ones. I respond in discussions like this to educate undecided readers.
> if i'm being completely honest, i'm not entirely sure what's even meant by the suggestion that ADD/ADHD is 'caused by the structure of the brain.'
> sentience is 'caused' by the 'structure of the brain.' and?
It's a direct refutation of your wrong claim "an ADD/ADHD diagnosis is not physiological", which you said a few posts back.
You know what the word "physiological" means, right? You said it, so it seems like you thought it was important enough to say, but now that it looks wrong you want to say it's not important?
The guidelines don't state that we're supposed to not disagree with misinformation, and if they did, I wouldn't comply.