I think he was generous enough with his time for creating the library in the first place and posting this update. It's not like he's owing anything to anybody. I don't understand how you can demand him to do further UNPAID work to recruit maintainers who would also do further unpaid work.
Are we collectively having Subversion phantom pains or something? Just take it.
This is an unrealistic and frankly a bit entitled of a criticism.
This is before we even get to stuff like “it’s not like yaml is a fast moving target, what continued maintenance is really even needed” parts of the equation, or the comment above that said he’s tried already.
We should remember that an unmaintained dependency isn’t the worst thing that can happen to a supply chain. There are far worse nightmare scenarios that involve exfiltrated keys, ransomewared files and such.
I’ll bet that if someone with a track record of contributing to the Rust community steps up, he’ll happily transfer control of the crate. But he’s not just going to assign it to some random internet user and put the whole ecosystem at risk.
Why can't this "someone else" just fork the repo themselves?
You can't. Ever. This is unironically why languages too old for package repositories like C and C++ lend themselves to stabler, higher-quality software.
On top of that is also the entitlement to feel like people providing you software for free MUST ALSO be responsible for polishing it forever. But, hey, I guess that attitude comes naturally with the package repository mindset. ;D People need to do all my work for me!
> stabler, higher-quality software.
Lol I’ll have some too buddy