If I have a tool, lets say I buy a 'doorbell' camera. Right now, the "app" must be curated and qualified and verified clear of defects, malware, etc by App store policy and review. (not that they are 100%, but it's a pretty decent process).
When a 'free app store' shows up, then this same doorbell camera company will just pop their app, which will become a much shittier version of what would have been available, into some shitty app store, and, not bother to make a better version.
What will happen, in practice, is that there will be some percentage of apps that become shittier and only available from the shitty 3rd party store, and not the curated (and not free) app store.
So, no, it won't be a simple matter of just "don't use that store", there will be more factors at play.
Then don't install one? I literally don't get this argument.
>>So, EU, back off on your pushing for a 3rd party app store.
....why? Because of something you don't want?
The state giveth and the state taketh.
The way you attributed it wasn't properly done though, it's like me saying "According to Google, Android has X times more malware...".
In fact, perplexity includes actual sources (via links). I couuld have posted the 8 sources that perplexity.ai cited.. I did not want to take the time.
Perplexity does have a sharelink, so, if you are really curious, here is the search and results
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/What-percentage-of-VTOCreO8...
I might give perplexity a try, looks really useful!