There is no citation needed. It is indeed trivial to fine-tune. Doing a good job is another matter, but the claim is correct. Google around and find a blog post showing how.
The claim that RAG is dead is obviously wrong.
The claim that RAG is dead is obviously wrong.
The internet is full of blog posts about this. That doesn't mean they're actually good - I'd love to be pointed at one that has proven itself useful for someone (and definitely isn't just LLM blog-spam).
I don't care if it's trivial to fine-tune and get crap results - I care about fine-tuning where the result was worth the effort.
For the record, my favourite guide to fine-tuning is the section of this Jeremy Howard video that shows how to train a text-to-SQL model: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkrNMKz9pWU&t=4850s
The person asked for citations, leave it be, stop dudexplaining how Internet works for you please.
I call bs on your 2 comments.
Even when people sincerely ask for a citation on a debatable topic, on an internet forum, it's effectively saying "I won't be hear any opinion that doesn't match my own unless it's as water tight as a law of physics". Another form of this is "show me the data".