Option 1 - Saint leader with no ties to money.
Option 2 - Corrupt leader with ties to money.
Cute but I'll go with option 2. He "sounded the alarm" to raise demand and price.
Why do you give merit to "members of both parties" opinion in fields of science? Said members choose to whom to listen and whom to ignore according to their agenda. History showed us decades upon decades of corrupt leadership that blatantly lie to their people. And you're here reciting some rehashed propaganda?