That's fairly rude. My point was that what manifests in myself as being negative manifests in other people as simply reading more into things than is actually there. Even trivial experiments are prone to biases.
That's rude.
How about your data? Like I said before, I'd be happy to see the data. You've thrown some numbers off the top of your head, but I'd rather see the raw gathered data.
> I didn't say "seeing things that aren't there" either. I said reading more into things than are there and seeing patterns where they don't exist.
Ha.
And it's not an ad hominum when the trait is something directly related to the topic at hand.