Stroustrup as always fails to recognize the vast surface area of C++ features, foot cannons, and the heavy weight of C compatibility around C++ neck.
C++ barely made sense in 1995. It makes absolutely no sense today.
C++ barely made sense in 1995. It makes absolutely no sense today.
For me it was the only language I could see myself using after getting used to Object Pascal quality of life, in tooling, type safety, and language features.
C felt jurassic already in 1993, and there wasn't any other portable alternative I could reach for.
However that copy-paste compatibility with C is what definitly has made it unsuitable for writing safe code nowadays, specially with the C culture that is now left.
Those of us that like C++, but also are on the safety side, have already embraced other programming languages, relegating C++ for the absolute must use cases.
and i don’t want to learn another language and package management system