most of my tools aren’t spying on me.
this sort of “privacy is impossible, we shouldn’t fight privacy invasions” is defeatist and toxic imho.
For example, is bookmark sync "spying"? I would say no, but many would say yes simply because that sync goes through someone else's machine. If the browser vendor uses aggregated domain popularity across bookmarks to inform their browser testing, is that now spying on me? Maybe, but the term "spying" has significant negative connotations that still don't feel justified to me. What if the browser vendor uses those bookmarks to target personalised information about browser feature improvements, is that now spying? I might find that a bit weird, but there's still an arguable user benefit there, and if that happened on device it's not really any different to most offline data analysis.
"Spying" really is a wide spectrum, from things that greatly benefit users with no privacy downside, to things that greatly benefit service providers with no user benefit. It's a nuance discussion that is worth having – just because something syncs to a server doesn't mean it's not worth doing, just because something is end to end encrypted doesn't mean it's not spying on you.
Things like the DMA are addressing this well I think. The DMA aims to prevent sharing of data for things the user did not opt in to, that are outside of the product remit. So a hypothetical cloud storage provider could not use that data for ad targeting without getting an opt in from the user, but the user can still use the storage service.
You are ignoring so much of the spying that is going on.
What about your phone? is it connected to cellphone towers? Is WiFi enabled... what about Bluetooth?
My kindle WiFi is permanently off. I use a usb cable. It stops it from downloading adverts to p*ss me off.
My projector doesn't have a WiFi chip. It has an hdmi cable to my laptop.
My laptop runs a pared down Linux, the only thing on it that spies on me is Google Chrome. That's a trade-off I'm comfortable with, since I use pihole to block the adverts so I don't have to see them.
It has been mentioned here in the past - in US there comes a guy (some 3-letter agency, probably NSA), installs new black box at ISP, and goes, nobody has a clue what that thingie does, mandated by law. That was before providers decided to just sell data themselves too (scrubbed probably, but not nearly well enough).
I get you have most of the stuff covered, fine for you, but its nowhere near 100%. And literally any phone out there is like swiss cheese all the way down to wifi chip OS from ie Broadcom.
I wonder if the NSA has a trained falcons corps for that...
my laptop’s traffic is regularly monitored both on and off device, and i also have root on it. it’s not spying on me- i know because one actually has to check these sorts of things.
That almost certainly is
> my camera
Are you sure your images aren't being tagged with location data? That's a pretty common feature these days
> my non-gsm vehicle
Most vehicles still record diagnostic data. Even if they don't upload it
> my television
How old is your TV? Any TV made in the last 5 years will be. 10+ years will still have diagnostic logs but might not upload them automatically.
Also satellite / cable TV networks track users too.
> my e-reader
I'd be very surprised if that was true.
> my paper library
As in your local library which you need to present your library card to check out publications? And who know who has what checkout out and for how long? They absolutely need to track their customers otherwise people would just steal books.
---
> this sort of “privacy is impossible, we shouldn’t fight privacy invasions” is defeatist and toxic imho.
This much I agree with.
If not, I have bad news for you...