Needs improvement. Something called *ability should be defined as a property, not a process. Good definitions do not randomly assign meaning to words without looking at its structure.
However, what is even worse IMHO, is when people do not invent new words, and overload an existing concept with a totally different meaning.
Yes existing terms have meaning, but they also have baggage.
Forming a new term is a reasonably effective way to shed that baggage and attempt to start the cycle all over again.
Seeing a term you’re not as familiar with and needing to look up the definition (whether that’s a local or a global definition) is usually a good thing IME.
Who has ever needed to look up the definition of something like "impactful" or "observability"...?