Take a large metal bucket or barrel.
Put a heating element and a simple oven thermostat on the bottom.
Fill with sand.
Connect to a solar panel or other enrgy source.
The air between the sand particles seem to actually provide a bit of convection and insulation.
The thermostat turns the circuit off before getting too hot for the heating element.
The heat accumulated during the day is slowly released over time directly through the metal.
Fitting Night Storage radiators was a much cheaper way of fitting central heating than the normal boiler and plumbing approach, and when electricity was cheaper it made more sense. Now, it makes no sense and if you buy a house with it the first thing you have to do is put in "proper" central heating. But maybe with excess renewables that will swing back.
Anyway, the real question here costs both in equipment and labor. Solar hot water panels involve plumbing and need radiators etc they quickly pay for themselves when heating a large home but don’t scale down very well.
Running the numbers I was surprised how cost competitive the sand bucket is for something like a chicken coop. Sure the panel(s) are wasted most of the year, but you don’t exactly need an electrician to set this up either. Probably also worth considering for redundancy in some situations.
IE: You can’t burn 500 gallons of gas if the end product costs 500$. That applies not just to transportation but also how much material and thus mining the raw materials you need, including refining them, the amount of chemicals you can use per panel, how much electricity you can use in production of the device including precursors etc.
One of the numbers I was looking at compared air sourced heat pump at night when it’s coldest vs this kind of resistive heat battery. Solar panels are far cheaper and better for the environment on a kWh/day basis so even if the COP is 3 (or less it gets colder at night) * 90%(losses from battery) = fewer panels you more than offset it by needing far more batteries.
Obviously solar thermal setups have advantages if you need lots of heat, but they are also wasted most of the year. If 8-10 months a year you’re only using them for hot water then annual efficiency is closer to 25% than 90%.
I used to buy this argument, but then:
A) PV panels got ridiculously cheap
B) everyone I know with solar hot water has emptied their systems because the maintenance hassles were not worth dealing with
Using high grade intermittent current to produce resistive heat isn’t high on my list of efficient things to do, but unfortunately neither is maintaining hot water panels.
How 'clean' of salts, etc. is the water being put through your panels?
Hard water clogs up faster.
That said, a heat pump running at 4:1 COP coupled to 20% efficient solar panels gets you right back to the same efficiency as solar thermal, with a lot more flexibility.
No single point of failure, sun heats the water directly and provides power, with a breakout box that accepts power in from the grid (if required), exports excess for points, hopefully that gets better over time, and accepts a local generator input if the PV panels are offline for some reason when there's a local grid power outage.
This is pretty good for now, there's loose neighbourhood discussion about perhaps getting a local area battery in a sea container that can buffer ~200 standard homes to further secure the town's energy stability.
Flexibility, in rural settings, is about having options not a single point of failure | dependency.
Eg: Way up the hill it's good to have PV panels on the bore pumps and better to have these independant of the house circuits with cables in place to route power "in case" .. along with option to use a generator if needed.
At least in residential and commercial installations, you get a much higher ROI by putting in solar electric, using the electricity to power your home/facility, and dumping the excess into the grid to earn money/credit.
Resistive heat storage is also a thing these days; hundred-plus gallon tanks that will take power from the panels if it's more cost effective than returning it to the grid or the grid doesn't have the capacity to take it. That water then feeds a second water heater which brings it up to the final temperature, if necessary.
The efficiency relative to area doesn't really matter, as rooftop space is rarely at a premium.
solar panel with sand is mechanically and electrically much simpler