> I think you're getting a bit lost in the debate!

This is the second time you've made accusations, which at this point feels like you're gaslighting me but I'll assume good intent. Here's what you claim:

> At no point did I claim that there is any reason to believe that human intelligence is a stochastic parrot.

Here's what you said:

> 1. Current gen AI may only seem like a stochastic parrot, but there's no reason to believe that human intelligence isn't just a really fancy stochastic parrot.