Besides the current costs (especially the solar PV part), there's the problem that you're throwing away most of your energy in the [electricity => hydrogen => electricity] loop. Electrolysis isn't perfect [1], but the big waste is electricity generation, with the best hydrogen fuel cells being only 50-60% efficient [2, SOFC "predicted"] (turbines smaller than utility scale would be far worse). In the most optimistic case you lose half of your stored energy (more likely 2/3rd).
Realistically you'd have to store almost all of your electricity -- compare solar output, a very short midday peak, with electricity demand, which in many places is nearly constant over time. Almost of all of it would go through the 50%+ storage losses, which means the solar part (PV + inverter + etc.) of your costs are more than doubled, amortized per kWh. So economically, practically anything is better than local hydrogen storage. (Under the premise that solar PV is not effectively free, which is an understatement to put it mildly).
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolysis#Electrolysis_of_wa...
[2] http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/fuelcells/f...