Reading the messages:

This is a marketing step of course, no sane lawyer would agree to this. And that is because, I don't think they show what they think and want to show.

That at some point Elon had an opinion that a lot of money is needed or that OpenAI maybe had no future? That does not change the duty or obligations of a non-profit to the mission.

Also, it is clear some important information has been blacked out. And that critical conversation happened offline.

I don't think it will do Elon the image pressure they think it will. But if I was Microsoft... I would hedge my bets a lot...

This looks more and more as giving fuel to a dissolution action of OpenAI as a non-profit than anything else.