I can appreciate folks coming to the defense of the demo, but the lede on what makes this special is pretty well buried to folks that aren't in this space.

If there was a blurb on the page stating that the cool bit we should be excited about isn't whether the image classification is accurate, but that there's realtime image classification running against WebGPU. That's definitely neat. However, with no context for folks clicking a random link, I don't think it's really all that off base for folks to comment on the model's functionality being comically inaccurate. At the time of writing, I had to read the bottom comment to get the understanding necessary for why this is neat.