Hacker News Reader

How is the inverse any more consistent?

Save the children, at any cost! Unless they're still in the womb, then feel free to murder them.

It's pretty consistent if you don't believe a fetus is a child.

Right, but they both cancel out.

Lets solve the children being shot in schools or being denied food and housing, before we tackle the children in the womb.

Whats the point of saving them in the womb if they will just get murdered in daycare?

There are orders of magnitudes more abortions than there are children who starve to death or get shot to death in USA, they aren't comparable at all if you actually believe abortion is murder. I don't think abortion is murder, but I don't think your argument here works against them, to them saving a thousand fetuses from getting aborted is worth more than saving one child that got shot.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com