Hacker News Reader

Comment by ThrowawayR2 | Hacker News Reader

This is said a lot here but Hacker News readers really should know how overblown that meme is. Most new products fail to find a market fit, whether at a FAANG or at a startup. The only difference is that the startup dies and therefore doesn't have any public memory of its product failure following it around and the FAANG doesn't because it has one or more cash cows to sustain itself.

View on HN

I don't have the impression that other FAANG companies launch (and then kill) same amount of products. I'm no fan of Apple (don't own any device from them), but still recognize that when they launch a product, it likely won't get abandoned in a year. That instills confidence and people are more likely to invest their money and time into it.

While tech enthusiasts are a minority, they often drive the adoption of new products and technologies.

I agree it's overblown and become a meme, but there is certainly some truth to it.

When Stadia was announced, I was one to push back about the silly "they'll just shut it down" stuff by pointing out that there's a big different between a massively invested product like Stadia and an RSS feed reader or a Could Print service. Then they showed me that investment $ wasn't a reassurance either...

I don't think they'll shut down Gemini, in fact I'd be utterly shocked if they did, so I do think it's memey and silly to avoid Gemini because "they might shut it down," but I would certainly not bet my company on it (by building on top of their APIs).

You aren't making a compelling argument for the future of Gemini.

Indeed, as I said I'd be shocked if they killed it, but I wouldn't bet my livelihood on it, so I would suggest everyone else do the same. I'll use it as a toy, but I'm not going to allow myself to become dependent on it.

There is a website dedicated to listing how many times Google has done this. It’s a long list.

The biggest insult really is these Google products often do have a reasonably large and dedicated following, it just doesn’t seem to be enough to move the needle compared to a monster ad business.

https://killedbygoogle.com/

Currently at 293.

It's really not overblown. Google's own culture rewards creating new things and does not reward iterative improvement.

I don't know, because these various startups don't pretend to have a cohesive vision/platform/ecosystem with each other, but that's exactly what Google, Apple, Microsoft, etc do.

I can't think of any apps or services that Apple has launched in the past decade and has since killed, whereas without even trying I can rattle off at least ten such projects by Google.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com