Hacker News Reader

grow up and explain why I'm wrong, instead of just downvoting me into oblivion—if I'm really so far off-base, wouldn't you want to correct my understanding of the situation?

View on HN

personally im not bothered by the output exactly per se: it would be great if they modified the dataset to be more inclusive instead. The invisible prompt editing is what really gets me. The fact that the ai is instructed after the fact to make changes to what you asked it to do, invisibly. These things really, REALLY need to be tool-shaped, if they do all sorts of hidden extra bits they will be vastly less useful and leaves room for vastly more nefarious ends.

Like would it be so hard for it to just show the prompt it submits to dall-e? help people learn how the system works?

> The fact that the ai is instructed after the fact to make changes to what you asked it to do, invisibly.

And what proof do you have that this paranoid story is happening?

Surely the most simple hypothesis is that this is a bug?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39509311

Reply on news.ycombinator.com