You can fly over the same spot at four different times of day and get four different readings.
You also really want nine magnetometers, one for each X,Y,Z axis and repeated on each wingtip and tail boom.
If you're going to filter like a professional you need a base station to record the diurnal flux and subtract that in post, you also need to fly calibration clover leafs in a magnetically level wide area and develop a Kalman filter to subract heading generated flux.
There's also the active magnetism compensation caused by the aircraft and its components, such as engine accessories, engine masses, avionics, current generated on the fuselage and other factors. If you're running a small fleet of aircraft to cover a million line kilometers or are otherwise pooling results into a standard magnetic map collection each aircraft will need to have its signature influence removed.
If you're mapping entire countries over decades then, of course, everything needs to be levelled against the changing IGRF (Internatinal Geomagnetic Reference Field), or the other one (there's another standard global magnetic reference field).
Then there's the question of just how small an iron rich rock you could reasonably get a blip from.
Sub detection in deep water is different problem to shallow, there's unlikely to be another magnetic source below the sub in deep water ... unlikely, but ...
Small surface magnetic objects can be masked by much much larger and deeper (in the earth or in the ocean) magnetic sources.
It's a field strength fall off with distance thing, and "mapping" is an inversion problem.
Now that we know, how does this help us to hide a submarine?
Add on a few days for calibration, sorting out airstrips and fuel supplies and you're sorted.
Next contract please.
Of course that leaves the post processing . . .
Drones took a bit long to arrive.
Eg. Australia has already been covered with multi instrument surveys (nine channel magnetics, 256 channel radiometrics, microwave radar DTM, etc.) with 27 million line-kilometres of survey data gridding the country.
https://ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/me...
https://www.ga.gov.au/about/projects/resources/awags
Australian, South African, Russian, Canadian companies and pilots have been jobbing on this work about the globe for decades, in the USofA the USGS and DoE have been surveying internally during the same 70 year period.
Such surveys are funded by large companies wanting to extend their exploration data, mid size companies wanting to firm up infomation on a prospect, and national governments | world bank projects that are looking to promote exploration and development in greenfield locations.