Hacker News Reader

We are having a disagreement over population ethics and the impact of AGW - I could hardly think of a less bro-y discussion if I tried.

I absolutely support population control, but all of my replies have been in reference to the specific scenario suggested of lowering population to 1 billion.

View on HN

you’re very specifically using rhetoric to:

- bring up other problems, which is definitely relevant because problems intertwine, but you’re avoiding focusing on any points regarding any single issue at a time. You still have to consider items, even when there’s a collection.

- bring vitriolic accusations (“GENOCIDE!”) into a discussion on plastic pollution, farming, and food supply. This is unacceptable.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com