Hacker News Reader

Here's one example: http://bactra.org/weblog/915.html

Is there something wrong there? I’m sorry if I’m being dense.

Attempting to goad a critical reviewer into engaging in some sort of comments-section "public debate" (assuming that somehow the public discussion would change the reviewer's mind) a _decade_ after the fact? That behavior is, in a word, insufferable.

EDIT: Also, "I know it was a challenge to review a book of its size..." comes off as insinuating that (1) the book is somehow "grand" and (2) maybe the reviewer didn't "get it".

I remember when it came out because a friend was excited about it. As I recall it’s a pretty large book.

Edit: just under 1200 pages on Amazon. I never got into it because I couldn’t figure out what the big revelation was supposed to be. It would take some serious dedication to go through such a large book for the sake of an unfavorable review.

I take wolfram’s words at face value.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com