I find this article frustrating to read. Here are the important bits:
> Conclusion: T. antiquus is a forgery [...]
> Part of the fossil, at least, appears to be genuine—the long bones of the hind limbs [...]
> Conclusion: T. antiquus is a forgery [...]
> Part of the fossil, at least, appears to be genuine—the long bones of the hind limbs [...]
No comments yet.