Combine that with the actual size of the Fab, hella lot of walking :)
As for solar panels, the Fab operates 24/7/364 (usually 1 downtime day a year). Which means even with the large amounts of snow that will build-up in the winter, there are always cars in the lot - clearing that is a big job and not sure how to do it with solar panels.
I'm not sure how much sense it'll make in this specific case, but in general, interestingly, with a high albedo (e.g. snow covered or white for some other reason) ground surface, vertically mounted bifacial panels produce very close to equator facing panels with the appropriate tilt. The value of that generation might actually be greater, as it obviously spreads out the profile towards the evening peaks.
For the regular horizontal/tilted ground mounts, NY is quite far north, so you're looking at a mount angle of 43° or so to optimise overall power production, and you can go about 15° more tilt and only lose maybe 1 or 2% of summer production, but increase production in winter when the sun is angled lower. If you go for like 55° to 58° tilt, there's probably not going to be very much snow accumulating on the panels themselves.
For fucks sake, large commercial (both office and industry) zones should only be permitted when the developers show a viable mass transit solution for their employees. Even if it's just buses, that's still better than thousands of cars.
[1] https://www.mdr.de/nachrichten/sachsen-anhalt/magdeburg/magd...
Hence campuses that are 85% parking lot.
Yeah and that is nuts. We lose ridiculous amounts of valuable land for barely any productive use - every day Germany loses 39 ha for buildings and 8 ha for transportation infrastructure [1], which means streets and parking lots.
Loss of land is an externality that doesn't get priced in anywhere.
[1] https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/boden-flaeche/bodenbel...
But we should also have a Land Value Tax to push people toward using it more productively.
Not every spot on Earth is a dense urban area.
I'm thinking that "excess parking" is usually due to wanting to secure a site with enough expansion potential but also putting it to use in the most cheap way possible (like, you won't verticalize the parking until needed and that would require more planning, permits, etc)
For an Amazon parcel sorter or a wholesaler distribution facility, sure, there are enough towns with desperate populations that can be exploited (and Amazon in particular is infamous for using that leverage).
But a company like Intel that needs highly educated staff? They won't go to some random village hours away from civilization.
With this in mind do you see the problem with only allowing factories to be built in places accessible to public transportation? The people making such proposals are seriously out of touch with half of the country.
It is also <30mi from Albany and ~20mi from Troy.
Loads of small towns aren't hours away from "civilization".
[1] https://www.consumerreports.org/corporate-accountability/ama...