Dupes are not just for the exact same URL. This topic has gotten a lot of attention on the frontpage, and there's no significant new information in this article.
you seem to be protecting people from discussing what they want to discuss
in addition, I wrote 2 first comments asking people to focus on a deeper conversation
and my focus was both in my forcefully changed title and in my first article-like comment that what is actually happening is attacking web capabilities
the first 2 comments were mine, an article and an ask towards the community to discuss things on a higher level (tech, legal) and forget these emotional outbursts that I hate pwa and I just dont want you to install another browser and that oh I love my walled garden because peopel just can use Safari with its protections
even if my thread was also flooded with not too deep comments, I think shadow banning was uncalled for!
nobody changed the misleading title here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39386569
dma did not kill anything whereas my title true: I am pissed, Apple is after web capabilities to protect close-to-100B tax revenue
To use this article as an example, you say you want to see a higher level discussion about the legal and technical aspects. A proper legal review of Apple's DMA position vs. the actual regulation text would definitely be fascinating to read and new information we haven't already seen multiple times. I'd totally upvote that. Maybe there's even a chance that such an article would lead to the higher level discussion you ask for. But it doesn't feel like that's at all what the article is? There's no analysis, just an assertion that this breaks the spirit and the letter of the law.
(I don't know anything about the various grivances you listed. I was just replying to agust since they were under the false impression that dupes were only for exact submissions of the same article.)
it was not my article btw, and it was the same practically as others
this higher level thing was a flop too, the discussion went on under other comments :)
my take is I have to right my first blog post somewhere if I have some time to analyze the issue
and then come back here and post it
the problem is I do not have time for this and Gemini hallucinates like hell so I cannot really work with a 66 page legal pdf efficiently :)
and I am not a gecko or chromium engineer or a lawyer so I actually lack the specific knowledge