So to me, it contributes because it is another data point that the leadership has compromised its ability to consistently make forward thinking decisions.
So to me, it contributes because it is another data point that the leadership has compromised its ability to consistently make forward thinking decisions.
Vision Pro patent from 2007 when Steve Jobs was still CEO:
Exhibit A: Google's patent on a "sticky car" that is covered with adhesive, to stick to pedestrians when you hit them https://patents.google.com/patent/US9340178B1/en
It's just a pair of sky googles with 2 displays in front of the eyes, connected to an Airpod for watching media. It's not so much Vision Pro as it is Nintendo Virtual Boy. Actually the virtual boy was more advanced since it let you play games.
That kind of stereo display headset for watching videos inputs from external sources has existed since the 70's, long before Apple's patent 2007. How did they even get a patent for it? Another proof the patent system is broken since it seems they'll let you patent anything.
Where are you seeing this "increasing trend"?
Also, how should a tech company that makes money from selling gadgets react to this purported trend? Start selling chairs?
"Human contact is becoming a luxury good." https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/23/sunday-review/human-conta...
>Also, how should a tech company that makes money from selling gadgets react to this purported trend?
That's like asking what cigarette companies were supposed to do when we found out cigarettes cause cancer.