But in this case, I'd bet that developing the math needed to solve it would end up with practical consequences. I think of your question sort of like "what are the practical applications of teaching an AI to master Starcraft?" Even if playing Starcraft isn't practical, the existence of such an AI implies lots of practical consequences.
Cryptography and coding theory and compression are three sides of the same (generalised) coin. Claude Shannon dabbled in all of them.
…or maybe the fact that it proves so hard to answer shows that we’re just wrong for thinking that it’s ‘elementary’. Therefore, any solution would necessarily require new breakthroughs that would lead to greater general understanding. So:
1) mathematicians would like to save face
2) you can’t solve difficult problems without accidentally solving other difficult ones that turn out to have immediate ‘practical’ importance
And a telephone company wanted to connect calls more easily, so they invented the transistor, which changed the world in unimaginably many ways. Sometimes you just don’t know where you’ll end up until you try it.